PREVIOUS PAGE • SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER • CLIENT LOGIN
Snake Oil in Palm-land
You've probably heard that your Web site must be modified so that it
will be accessible via WAP devices. The urgency with which some are recommending
this might make you think that your business will be in jeopardy if you
delay.
First, let's be clear on what a WAP device is.
WAP stands for "wireless application protocol", the standards defined
for sending and receiving data from devices such as the Palm VII and new
WAP-enabled cell phones. These standards were developed by mobile phone
manufacturers Ericsson, Motorola, and Nokia, along with software company
Unwired Planet (now Phone.com).
A WAP-enabled PDA (personal digital assistant) or WAP-enabled phone will
allow you to view a Web site from the comfort of a taxi. You can also
send and receive e-mail while dining in a fancy restaurant with a WAP
mobile phone or a 2-way pager. Other devices being developed will combine
the features of these various units into one multi-purpose pocket-sized
over-hyphenated organizer-communicator thingy. Maybe it'll be a "WAPhonePDA".
Should you make your Web site available to people who have these devices?
Will your business fail if you don't? Before you hire somebody to do the
conversion, ask why you need to do it. Is your business one that might
reasonably be expected to make a lot of sales to people who are eating
dinner in a restaurant, sitting in the back of a taxi, or sitting in a
traffic jam?
If the answer to that question is No, then why would you want to spend
thousands (or possibly tens of thousands) of dollars to WAPize your Web
site? Because it's trendy?
Business decisions should be made based on what is prudent for the business.
A jeweler who sells nothing larger than a wedding ring would be foolish
to buy a panel truck for deliveries simply because his neighbor, a repair
shop, needs a panel truck to pick up parts for her mechanics.
Stock brokers will want to migrate their applications to WAP devices
promptly because those who buy and sell stocks want immediate access.
Likewise on-line travel services. If my flight is cancelled, I know that
I have a better chance booking a new flight on-line than standing in line
at the airport. News services, too. Many of the people who read CNN's
Web site today do so with portable devices.
These Web sites must make their sites available to WAP users. But it
seems unlikely that more than a few people will want to read my Web site
on a WAP device! It just doesn't make sense for me to port my site to
this new medium - or, more accurately, to these new media. It's not just
one WAP device that you have to design for, after all. The display characteristics
of a WAP phone differ greatly from those of a Palm VII. By comparison,
the Palm VII's screen is huge.
Those who have a Palm IIIc and an attached WAP modem will see sites in
color, while users of mobile phones and other Palm devices will view monochrome
screens. During television's "golden age", when most sets displayed pictures
in black and white, stage designers selected colors that worked well in
monochrome. Bright red was a lousy gray in black and white. Color televisions
made stage designers' jobs harder. They were suddenly faced with the need
to find colors that worked well on both color and monochrome screens.
It's a hard job, but nobody has to do it
Unless you're sincerely convinced that your site must soon be ported
to WAP devices, just sit back and let others pay for the research that
will eventually solve the conversion problems.
Beyond the color issue there is the need - for WAP devices - to create
a secondary site that is different in nearly every way from your standard
Web site.
If you think a 56K modem is slow, wait until you see data transfer rates
on a WAP device. That and the low resolution of the screens suggest limiting
or removing graphics from the WAP part of the site.
Text must be limited, too, because screens display as little as a few
dozen words. Even the largest current display won't allow more than 100
words or so, while the average page of a standard Web site can easily
show 300 words.
Yogi Berra is credited with saying, "When you find a fork in the road,
take it." For Web site designers, that fork is the divergence between
what can and should be done for standard monitor users - and what can
and should be done for those who use WAP devices.
A site designed for a WAP device won't look good on a standard monitor
and vice versa. If you expect significant numbers of visitors to have
WAP devices, then you must begin to think about redesigning the site for
these devices. It will be expensive, tedious for the designer, and likely
to result in inconsistencies between various versions of the site.
Let's wait for it
Besides personal digital assistants like those from Palm, Handspring,
and Sony, expect a flood of new WAP-enabled phones in the next 12 months.
Add services like WebTV and AOL's new TV-based option, Net appliances,
and other interactive devices that are being developed and it becomes
clear that deciding to design a Web site for these devices should not
be taken lightly.
The good news is that some companies are working on tools that will simplify
the conversion process. IBM, for example, has a "transcoding" process
that converts the language used by standard Web pages to that required
by WAP devices. If your site must be WAPped, this could be a viable option.
If WAP access isn't essential to your site, the wisest move would be
no move at all. Ignore the hype. This road is long and the journey could
be needlessly expensive.
|